CFA Program Level I
Conflicts of interest and priority of trades: CFA Level I
Standard VI(A) requires members and candidates to avoid, or fully and fairly disclose, matters that could reasonably be expected to impair their independence and objectivity, and the disclosure must be prominent, in plain language and effectively communicated. Standard VI(B) puts client transactions first, employer transactions second and transactions the member beneficially owns last.
What counts as a conflict
A conflict of interest is anything that could reasonably be expected to impair independence and objectivity, or to raise a question about whether judgment is free from bias. Conflicts arise between clients' interests, the employer's interests and personal interests. Compensation structures, especially short-term incentives, are a common source.
Owning shares in a company you recommend, or that clients hold, is the most common conflict needing disclosure. CFA Institute says banning such ownership would be the simplest fix but may be overly burdensome. Instead, members must disclose any beneficial ownership in the investments they recommend.
Avoid first, then disclose properly
Since the 2023 revision, VI(A) says avoid or disclose. Avoiding the conflict and its appearance is preferred where reasonable. When it cannot reasonably be avoided, it must be disclosed fully and clearly, mitigated where possible, and the disclosure updated when the conflict changes materially. Disclosure to an employer must give enough information to judge the conflict's impact.
The disclosure must be prominent and in plain language. CFA Institute's glossary defines prominent language as placed so it can be clearly seen or easily accessed, and not formatted to hide it, for example with a smaller font or by moving it to a footnote or appendix. A conflict mentioned only in small print in an appendix is therefore not adequately disclosed.
Example: an analyst rates a company a buy. His wife then inherits a large holding in it, and he is asked to update the report. At a minimum he must disclose the holding to his employer and in the report. Best practice is to have another analyst write it.
Priority of transactions
VI(B) says transactions for clients and employers have priority over transactions in which the member is a beneficial owner. The guidance puts client transactions ahead of the firm's. The order is clients, then employer, then the member.
A beneficial owner is someone who ultimately owns, controls, can direct or has a material interest in a security. Personal transactions include the member's own accounts, immediate family accounts and accounts in which the member has a direct or indirect financial interest. They may take place only after clients and the employer have had an adequate chance to act on a recommendation.
A family member's account that is a client account is treated like any other client account, with no special treatment and no disadvantage. Common firm controls include limits on IPO and private placement participation, blackout periods, preclearance and duplicate trade confirmations.
Where the exam catches people
- Believing an analyst must sell a stock before recommending it: owning it is allowed if the beneficial ownership is disclosed and clients are not disadvantaged.
- Believing any written disclosure satisfies VI(A): it must be prominent and in plain language, so a small-font footnote or appendix does not count.
- Believing a spouse's holding is not the analyst's conflict: it could reasonably impair objectivity, so at a minimum it must be disclosed to the employer and in the research.
- Believing the employer's trades come before clients': the order is clients, then employer, then the member's own transactions.
- Believing family accounts must wait behind all other clients: a family member who is a client is treated like any other client.