CFA Program Level I
Monetary vs fiscal policy: CFA Level I explained
Monetary policy is the central bank's control of interest rates and money; fiscal policy is the government's decisions on taxes and spending. Monetary policy and automatic fiscal stabilizers act first because they are fast, while discretionary fiscal policy suffers long legislative lags. It becomes the main tool when the policy rate is at zero or the downturn is deep and long.
How monetary policy works
The Fed's goals are maximum employment and stable prices, with 2% PCE inflation as the price goal. Its main tool is the target for the federal funds rate, the overnight rate at which banks borrow reserves.
With reserves abundant, the Fed moves the federal funds rate by changing the interest rate it pays on reserve balances. Banks will not lend reserves for less than they can earn risk-free at the Fed, so raising that rate lifts the funds rate. Target changes are usually matched by changes in the rate on reserves.
Rate changes pass to other short-term rates quickly, then to longer-term rates through expectations, to stock and house prices, and to the exchange rate. An easing that lowers the dollar makes US goods cheaper relative to foreign goods. When the policy rate was near zero after 2008, the Fed bought about $3.7 trillion of longer-term securities to push down longer-term yields.
How fiscal policy works
Fiscal policy is government spending and taxes. An expansion raises spending or cuts taxes to lift demand and output.
Automatic stabilizers act without new laws: in a downturn unemployment benefits rise and tax receipts fall. Discretionary policy is a deliberate legislated change in spending or taxes.
The standardized budget balance adjusts the actual balance for automatic stabilizers, so its change shows discretionary policy. Example: in a recession the actual balance moves from a 1.0% of GDP surplus to a 2.0% deficit, while the standardized balance stays at a 0.5% surplus. The 3-point swing came from automatic stabilizers, and the discretionary stance did not change.
Which one, when
The FRBSF letter argues the main case against discretionary fiscal policy is the legislative lag: recognize the slowdown, propose, debate, pass and sign. For a typical mild recession, the economy is often recovering before the package arrives. The Fed can cut rates within weeks, as it did in January 2001.
So monetary policy and automatic stabilizers are the first line of defence. Discretionary fiscal policy matters more when the policy rate is at zero and monetary policy may be unable to do more, or when the downturn is severe enough that a stimulus would still arrive in time.
Expectations matter for fiscal policy. A temporary tax cut may have a smaller effect than a permanent one, and deficit spending can raise long-term rates if markets expect future tax increases or doubt solvency.
Where the exam catches people
- Believing a wider actual deficit proves an expansionary fiscal stance: if the standardized balance is unchanged, the swing came from automatic stabilizers.
- Believing the Fed raises the funds rate with ample reserves by draining reserves: its main means is raising the interest rate it pays on reserve balances.
- Believing discretionary fiscal policy is the first response to every recession: legislative lags make it too slow for typical short downturns.
- Believing tax and tariff rates are monetary policy tools: they are set by the government, as fiscal and trade policy.
- Believing an easing helps only through domestic interest rates: a lower dollar also makes US products cheaper relative to foreign ones.