Certopolis

CFA Program Level I

Gordon growth model and two-stage DDM: CFA Level I

The Gordon growth model values a share as next year's dividend divided by the required return minus the constant growth rate, V0 = D1 / (r - g), with r above g. Rearranged, the dividend yield equals r - g. A two-stage model discounts the high-growth dividends and a Gordon terminal value back to today.

The constant-growth model

If dividends grow at a constant rate g forever, V0 = D0 x (1 + g) / (r - g) = D1 / (r - g), where r must exceed g.

Example: the dividend just paid is USD2.00, g is 4% and r is 9%. D1 = 2.00 x 1.04 = USD2.08. V0 = 2.08 / (0.09 - 0.04) = USD41.60.

The model suits companies whose dividends grow at a stable rate comparable to or below the economy's nominal growth rate, and broad equity indexes. Its values are very sensitive to r and g.

Yield plus growth

Rearranged, D1 / V0 = r - g, and if price equals value, r = D1 / P0 + g. In the example, 2.08 / 41.60 = 5.0% = 9% - 4%.

With the same required return, a lower dividend yield means faster expected growth. Two shares priced at r = 8%, one yielding 2.5% and one 5.0%, imply growth of 5.5% and 3.0%.

The model can be turned round to find the growth rate implied by a price. If only the dividend just paid is known, D1 = D0 x (1 + g), so g appears on both sides and must be solved for.

Two-stage DDM, worked

Value = present value of the high-growth dividends + present value of a terminal value at the end of the high-growth period. The terminal value uses the Gordon model with the first dividend of the stable period.

Example: D0 = USD1.00, growth 10% for two years then 3% forever, r = 8%. D1 = 1.10, D2 = 1.21, D3 = 1.21 x 1.03 = 1.2463.

Terminal value at the end of year 2 = 1.2463 / (0.08 - 0.03) = USD24.926. V0 = 1.10 / 1.08 + (1.21 + 24.926) / 1.08^2 = 1.019 + 22.407 = USD23.43.

Where the exam catches people

  • Believing the Gordon model uses the dividend just paid in the numerator: it uses D1, next period's dividend.
  • Believing a high dividend yield means a higher expected return when r is the same: it means slower expected growth.
  • Believing the terminal value is already a present value: the Gordon formula gives a value one period before the dividend used, which must still be discounted to today.
  • Believing the model works when g is at or above r: it requires r greater than g.

Written from CFA Institute's documentation

Try 3 questions on this

Pick an answer to see why each option is right or wrong.

  1. An analyst values Halvern Utilities with the constant-growth (Gordon) dividend discount model, using a required return on equity of 8.5% and dividend growth of 3.5% a year in perpetuity. If Halvern's shares trade at the model's value, the dividend-price ratio is closest to:

    Right. In the game that’s Renown for your Equities building.

    Not that one: A is right. In the game your Equities building would lose a little Renown, and this question would come back later.

  2. Larkspur Robotics has just paid an annual dividend of USD1.50 per share. An analyst expects the dividend to grow 12% next year and 4% a year thereafter in perpetuity, and uses a required return on equity of 10%. Using a two-stage dividend discount model with the terminal value set at the end of Year 1, Larkspur's intrinsic value per share is closest to:

    Right. In the game that’s Renown for your Equities building.

    Not that one: A is right. In the game your Equities building would lose a little Renown, and this question would come back later.

    Show the full explanation and doc quotes

    D1 = 1.50 x 1.12 = 1.68. D2 = 1.68 x 1.04 = 1.7472. Terminal value at end of Year 1 = D2 / (r - g) = 1.7472 / (0.10 - 0.04) = 29.12. Value = (1.68 + 29.12) / 1.10 = 30.80 / 1.10 = USD28.00.

    Written from www.cfainstitute.org/insights/professional-learning/refresher-readings/2026/equity-valuation-concepts-basic-tools

  3. Two utilities, Ashcombe and Brennock, are judged equally risky, so an analyst applies the same required return on equity to both. Each share trades at its constant-growth dividend discount model value. Ashcombe's dividend yield is 2.5% and Brennock's is 5.0%. Which statement is most accurate?

    Right. In the game that’s Renown for your Equities building.

    Not that one: B is right. In the game your Equities building would lose a little Renown, and this question would come back later.

    Show the full explanation and doc quotes

    With the same r for both, Ashcombe's lower yield means its expected dividend growth is 2.5 percentage points higher than Brennock's.

    Written from www.federalreserve.gov/pubs/feds/2000/200005/200005pap.pdf